Damaan Bachao Taralla
background
development induced destructions
maps
Chashma Irrigation Project
introduction
concerns
histories of chashma struggles
Chashma Lok Sath
　 opening declaration
　 Judgement
　 stories
　 statements
Chashma Inspection
　 introduction
　 what is inspection?
　 Claims and Process
　 GRSC
People's Struggles
　 Projects
　 Issues
News& Updates
　 2004
　 2003
Resources
　 Library
　 Images
　 Relevant Links
About Us
　 who are we
　 aims and objectives
　 contacts
　
　
CHASHMA INSPECTION CLAIM TO THE ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK (ADB)
　
　
Chashma Inspection Request filed with the Board Inspection Committee
under the Inspection Procedures of ADB. 19 November 2002
Click here for pdf version of the full document
CONTENTS
　 　
I. INTRODUCTION
II. ASSESSMENT OF MANAGEMENT RESPONSE
A. Grievance Redress and Settlement Committee: insufficient and irrelevant step with regard to the inspection process
B. Nature and incidence of noncompliance in CRBIP Stage III
III.

BACkGROUND AND BRIEF HISTORY OF PROJECT DESIGN PREPARATION AND IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS
IV. OUR CONCERNS
A. Alternative project options assessment and design-related social and environmental problems
B. Changes in project design, additional financing and Project reappraisal
C. Project induced flooding and involuntary resettlement
D. Forced land acquisition and compensation
E. Lifestyle disruptions, livelihood losses and threats of in-migration
F. Environmental concerns
G. Information sharing, consultation and participation of the affected people
V.

STEPS TAKEN TO CONVEY CONCERNS TO THE BANK

VI. CONCLUSION
　 　
Annexure 1: Response of ADB Management to the Initial Complaint on the Chashma Right Bank Irrigation Project (Stage III)
Annexure 2:

Letter of Representation (authorization from the affectees)
　
　
　
SECOND SUPPLEMENT TO INSPECTION CLAIM. 25 February 2003.
Click here for pdf version of the full document
CONTENTS
I.. Introduction
II. The GRSC is Inadequate and Unrealistc
A. General Comments: The GRSC does not represent emerging mlti-stakeholders' dialogue and decision making approaches
B. Specific Comments on the GRSC
(i) The GRSC does not address our specific and concrete demands made in the Request
(ii) Policy and legal framework for the GRSC us arbitrary and inadequate with regard to the compliance conditions
(iii) Institutional and decision-making framework for the COmmittee is inadequate and against the interests of the Project affectees
C. Effectiveness of the Inspection FUnction and the GRSC
III. Why the Requester Opted to Stay Away from the Negotiation Process?
IV. Conclusion

　

　
Attachments:
1. Video documentary on the Chashma Right Bank Irrigation Project
2. Photographs of the scenes of flooding of Sokkar village and breaching of the main canal which occured in August 2001
3. Comments of civil society organizations and the project affectees on the Social Impact Assessment and the proposed Chashma Multi-stakeholders Dialogue
4. Statement of the representatives of NGOs and the Project affectees after the Chashma Multi-stakeholders Dialogue Woekshop of March 2003.
5. Copies of the correspondence between the Requester and Management
　
　
　
copyright 2003-2004 MAUJ all right reserved.
inserted by FC2 system